1.1 Critical analysis – component parts of an argument transcript

Argument

“Social media platforms must adopt more stringent content moderation policies to prevent the spread of misinformation, hate speech, and harmful content. By implementing stricter content moderation measures, platforms can foster a healthier online environment, build trust among users, and contribute to a more ethical digital environment.”

Argument adapted from AI generated text. OpenAI (2024) Chat GPT [Large language model] accessed February 13, 2024.

Example breakdown of the argument’s component parts

Thesis statement

Identify the argument they are making.

The evidence provided

Examine each piece of supporting evidence they have provided in depth (misinformation, hate speech, harmful content). This means looking for other sources and evidence that what they claim is accurate (or inaccurate).

Structure and language

Evaluate the logical flow and coherence of the argument, considering the main argument and the supporting evidence. Does the supporting evidence contribute to the claim? Analyse the language used in the argument for persuasive effect. Has emotive language been used to distract from facts?

Counterarguments

Identify the potential counterarguments (which could include concerns about freedom of speech, or the challenges of defining and moderating content). Does the original argument address and refute any significant counter arguments?

Recommendations and promises

Consider whether the argument’s recommendations (strict content moderation) are achievable. What are the challenges to implementing them? What about the promised outcomes? Is there evidence that the recommendations would lead to these outcomes (healthier online environment, more trust) or are they assumptions?

Assumptions

Identify any parts of the argument that haven’t been supported by evidence (for example, that more moderation will lead to a healthier online environment).